• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Workplace Legal

HR & Employment Law Firm

HR & Employment Law Counseling and Litigation(415) 851-8900
  • Why Workplace Legal?
  • Practice Areas
    • Advice and Counseling
    • Employment Disputes and Litigation
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • HR Strategy and Infrastructure
    • Executive Severance Negotiation
    • Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
    • Wage and Hour
    • Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Executive and Professional Recruiting
  • Team
    • Jeffrey S. Sloan
    • Michaela Hug-Nelsen
    • Kathleen M. Pratt
  • HR & Employment Law Blog
  • Offices
    • San Francisco
    • Oakland/East Bay
    • Orange County
  • Client Portal

Posts Tagged With: Starbucks

CA Supreme Court Rejects the “De Minimis” Doctrine — Employers Must Now Pay for Every Minute Worked by an Employee

August 2, 2018 by Jeffrey S. Sloan

CA Supreme Court Rejects the “De Minimis” Doctrine — Employers Must Now Pay for Every Minute Worked by an Employee

California has some of the strictest and most complicated wage and hour laws in the nation.  And guess what?  They’re even stricter and more complicated now after the California Supreme Court rejected the “de minimis” defense for employers in wage and hour disputes in California. What’s the “de minimis” defense anyway? Beginning in 1961, federal… Read More

Categories: Compensation and Benefits, Employment Law Advice & Counsel Tags: CA Supreme Court, de minimis, Starbucks, Troester, wage and hour

Primary Sidebar

Practice Areas

  • Advice and Counseling
  • Employment Disputes and Litigation
  • Alternate Dispute Resolution
  • HR Strategy and Infrastructure
  • Executive Severance Negotiation
  • Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
  • Wage and Hour
  • Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition
  • Workplace Investigations
  • Executive and Professional Recruiting

Recent Blog Posts

  • 2019 Brings New Laws and Obligations for California Employers
  • Dynamex “ABC Test” Limited to Wage and Hour Claims Only
  • Employers’ Group Sues California Claiming PAGA is Unconstitutional
  • Smart Onboarding Improves Employee Retention
  • Section 998 Offers Cannot Shift Attorneys’ Fees to Plaintiffs in FEHA Cases

Copyright © 2019 | Workplace Legal, A Professional Law Corporation | SITEMAP | TERMS OF USE