Archive for Employment Agreements

Employers, Beware: Right to Arbitrate can be Waived

Arbitration agreements that are well-drafted and “state-of-the-art” under current California law are key to ensuring that employment disputes will be resolved by final and binding arbitration.  But a recent California Court of Appeal case – Fleming Distribution Co. v. Younan (Cal. Ct. App., May 15, 2020, No. A157038)…

Pay Your Arbitration Fees Late? Risk Losing Your Right to Arbitrate

Senate Bill (“SB”) 707, which became effective on January 1, 2020, creates substantial consequences for employers that fail to pay the costs and fees associated with the arbitration on time. Specifically, after January 1, 2020, an employer that fails to pay arbitration fees within 30 days after such…

Court Blocks AB 51 From Taking Effect on January 1, 2020

AB 51 was signed by Governor Newsom back in October 2019.  AB 51 generally prohibited employers from requiring employees, as a condition of employment, to agree to arbitrate any future Labor Code claims and/or Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) claims.  AB 51 also made it illegal for…

Three New Cases on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements

In the employment context, an arbitration agreement is a contract between an employer and an employee in which the parties agree to resolve disputes in front of an arbitrator rather than in civil court.  These agreements are often standard in new hire paperwork. Employers like arbitration because it…

Independent Contractors Remain Dangerous for California Employers

As we blogged about last year here, in May 2018 the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court and dramatically changed the standard for determining whether California workers could be classified as employees or independent contractors.  One key question that the Dynamex…

Clever Contract Language Cannot Defeat Labor Code 218.5’s Fee-Shifting Effect

Under existing California law, an employee who prevails on his/her claims against an employer for non-payment of wages is entitled to recover his/her attorneys’ fees in addition to the unpaid wages owed.  But the same is not true for an employer who prevails.  Under existing California law, an…

SCOTUS Rules Employees Cannot Band Together in Class Arbitrations

In yet another split 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lamps Plus v. Varela that employees at a California business could not band together in a class-wide arbitration.  Instead, the Supreme Court ruled, each employee was required to proceed independently in an individual arbitration. The Supreme…

One Day, Two Opposite Results in Arbitration Cases

On the same day, two different California appellate courts reached opposite conclusions as to whether an employer’s arbitration agreement was enforceable or not. Subcontracting Concepts v. DeMelo — Arbitration Agreement Void and Unenforceable In one case, Subcontracting Concepts, LLC v. DeMelo, the Court found that the arbitration agreement was both…

An Employee’s Single PAGA Claim Cannot Be Split into Arbitration and Litigation Pieces

Back in 2014, the California Supreme Court ruled in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles that an individual employee who has signed a mandatory arbitration agreement may be compelled to arbitrate his “individual damages claims.”  However, if that employee joins a representative PAGA claim to his other damages claims, that…

2019 Brings New Laws and Obligations for California Employers

Last year was a busy legislative year in California.  The #MeToo and #TimesUp movements in particular spawned a host of new employment laws that took effect on January 1st.  If you haven’t done so already, you should review your employee handbook and personnel policies to make sure that you are…