Archive for PAGA

Employees Can Now Seek Civil Penalties For Late Wages

Starting January 1, 2020, California employees will be able to seek penalties from their employers directly for late payment of wages. If you are wondering thinking employees were already able to do that, you are partially right. On October 10, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 673 (“AB 673”),…

California Supreme Court Gives Employers a PAGA Victory

In a rare “win” for California employers, the California Supreme Court recently ruled in ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court that the “underpaid wages” authorized by Labor Code §558 are not recoverable in a PAGA action. California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) As readers of this blog know well, PAGA…

Missed Meal/Rest Periods Don’t Trigger Waiting Time Penalties

The California Court of Appeals recently ruled in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services that an employer’s failure to pay meal or rest period premium pay for an employee who is denied a meal period does not trigger derivative (a) waiting time penalties under Labor Code §203, or (b)…

EPLI Insurance May Cover Some Wage-and-Hour Claims

Employment practices liability insurance (“EPLI”) policies often contain explicit language that excludes from coverage or defense claims that are based on any federal or state wage-and-hour laws.  Recently, the California Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal gave employers a glimmer of hope – and an incentive to push back…

An Employee’s Single PAGA Claim Cannot Be Split into Arbitration and Litigation Pieces

Back in 2014, the California Supreme Court ruled in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles that an individual employee who has signed a mandatory arbitration agreement may be compelled to arbitrate his “individual damages claims.”  However, if that employee joins a representative PAGA claim to his other damages claims, that…

Employers’ Group Sues California Claiming PAGA is Unconstitutional

Last week, an employers’ group that represents small and medium sized business across California sued the State claiming that its Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) statute was unconstitutional. As readers of this blog know, PAGA is a controversial state statute, found in the Labor Code, that allows an…

Corporate Owners and Officers are Individually Liable for PAGA Penalties

Readers of this blog know the potent plaintiff’s weapon that is California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”).  PAGA allows an individual employee to “stand in the shoes of the State” and sue his employer for civil penalties flowing from the employer’s wage-and-hour violations. What makes PAGA so devastating…

Arbitration Agreements — A Seawall to Surging PAGA Lawsuits?

Since its passage in 2004, California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) has been a weapon used by employees and their lawyers across California.  PAGA allows one “aggrieved employee” to sue his/her employer in a representative capacity and to recover penalties and attorneys’ fees for technical violations of the California…

Accidental Pay Stub Violations Create PAGA Liability

What happens when an employer inadvertently hands out pay stubs that the employer does not realize are missing some required information? Well, given that this is California, you can probably guess the answer.

CA Supreme Court — Employees Have Broad Discovery Rights in PAGA Actions

Yesterday, in a unanimous 7-0 opinion, the California Supreme Court held in Williams v. Marshalls of CA that plaintiffs suing employers in Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) are entitled to broad discovery rights.  Specifically, the Court held that PAGA plaintiffs can force an employer-defendant to turn over the names and…