Archive for Employment Litigation

Think Twice Before Deleting Those Text Messages!

Last week, in Jones vs. Riot Hospitality Group LLC, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff’s employment discrimination suit because the plaintiff was found to have destroyed evidence. During the litigation in the trial court, the employer became concerned that the plaintiff had…

Are “Stay Or Pay” Clauses The New Non-Competes?

Today’s New York Times contains an excellent article on the increasing use of so-called “stay or pay” clauses in employment agreements.  Once an employee signs a contract with a “stay or pay” clause, if that employee quits before X months/years (each contract is different), the employee will have…

Firing Employee for Misconduct and Poor Performance Not Discriminatory, Even if Misconduct Related to Employee’s Religion

Ronald Hittle was the Fire Chief in Stockton, California.  In May 2010, the City received an anonymous letter describing Hittle as a “corrupt, racist, lying, religious fanatic who should not be allowed to continue as the Fire Chief of Stockton.”  It was later revealed that the letter came…

California’s Supreme Court Erases Viking River’s PAGA Victory for Employers

The California Supreme Court recently issued its highly anticipated decision in Adolph v. Uber and answered the key question of whether the California courts would follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Viking River.  The California Supreme Court’s answer was a resounding “NO.”  Now, after Adolph v. Uber,…

Supreme Court: Employers Must Accommodate Employees’ Religious Practices

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled, in Groff v. DeJoy, that employers have a heightened duty to accommodate their employees’ religious practices.

Employees Now Can Sue Under PAGA for Paid Sick Leave Violations

California’s Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act (known as the “Paid Sick Leave Law” or “PSLL”) requires employers to provide employees, with a few narrow exceptions, three days of paid sick leave each year.  The PSLL does not give employees a private right of action, meaning that employees can’t…

California Courts are Refusing to Follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s Viking River Decision

California Courts are Refusing to Follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s Viking River Decision, which means that U.S. Supreme Court decision may not offer employers a clever PAGA escape hatch after all.

Employers Beware: Don’t Allow Employees to e-Sign Arbitration Agreements

Many (wise) California employers use arbitration agreements requiring employees to submit any future employment-related dispute to mandatory arbitration.  Arbitration is typically favored by employers because it is cheaper, faster, and more private than litigation.  There’s also the perception that arbitrators are more conservative and less emotional than jurors,…

The Beginning of the End for California’s Independent Contractor Law AB 5?

California’s strict independent contractor law known as AB 5 – which prohibits businesses from classifying a worker as an independent contractor unless they can pass all three prongs of the stringent “ABC Test” – may soon be a thing of the past. On March 17, 2023, the Ninth…

Federal Court Blocks Implementation of CA’s Anti-Arbitration Statute AB 51

In a rare win for California employers the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that AB 51 could not be enforced in California because it unduly burdened the right to agree to arbitration in violation of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). AB 51 is the California statute…