Archive for Employment Litigation

California’s Supreme Court Erases Viking River’s PAGA Victory for Employers

The California Supreme Court recently issued its highly anticipated decision in Adolph v. Uber and answered the key question of whether the California courts would follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Viking River.  The California Supreme Court’s answer was a resounding “NO.”  Now, after Adolph v. Uber,…

Supreme Court: Employers Must Accommodate Employees’ Religious Practices

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled, in Groff v. DeJoy, that employers have a heightened duty to accommodate their employees’ religious practices.

Employees Now Can Sue Under PAGA for Paid Sick Leave Violations

California’s Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act (known as the “Paid Sick Leave Law” or “PSLL”) requires employers to provide employees, with a few narrow exceptions, three days of paid sick leave each year.  The PSLL does not give employees a private right of action, meaning that employees can’t…

California Courts are Refusing to Follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s Viking River Decision

California Courts are Refusing to Follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s Viking River Decision, which means that U.S. Supreme Court decision may not offer employers a clever PAGA escape hatch after all.

Employers Beware: Don’t Allow Employees to e-Sign Arbitration Agreements

Many (wise) California employers use arbitration agreements requiring employees to submit any future employment-related dispute to mandatory arbitration.  Arbitration is typically favored by employers because it is cheaper, faster, and more private than litigation.  There’s also the perception that arbitrators are more conservative and less emotional than jurors,…

The Beginning of the End for California’s Independent Contractor Law AB 5?

California’s strict independent contractor law known as AB 5 – which prohibits businesses from classifying a worker as an independent contractor unless they can pass all three prongs of the stringent “ABC Test” – may soon be a thing of the past. On March 17, 2023, the Ninth…

Federal Court Blocks Implementation of CA’s Anti-Arbitration Statute AB 51

In a rare win for California employers the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that AB 51 could not be enforced in California because it unduly burdened the right to agree to arbitration in violation of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). AB 51 is the California statute…

Federal Court Rules that Gender Dysphoria is a Disability Protected the ADA

On August 16, 2022, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Williams v. Kincaid that transgender people who experience gender dysphoria are protected from discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Gender dysphoria is a “discomfort or distress that is caused by a discrepancy between a…

U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Bombshell PAGA Ruling in Favor of Employers

On June 15, 2022, in a blockbuster case known as Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, the U.S. Supreme Court finally answered a burning employment law issue here in California – whether California’s rule prohibiting the use of arbitration agreements to force an employee to waive her right…

CA Supreme Court: Meal/Rest Period “Premium Pay” Is Wages

On May 22, 2022, the California Supreme Court held in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. that premium payments owed by an employer to a non-exempt employee for missed meal/rest periods are “wages” and not penalties.  Thus, when those premium payments are owed but not timely paid, the…