On May 22, 2023, the California Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision expanding employee whistleblower protection. In People ex rel. Garcia-Brower v. Kolla’s Inc., the Court held that the definition of the term “disclosure” in California Labor Code section 1102.5 includes reporting of a violation of a state or federal statute, or a violation of or… Read More
Posts Tagged With: CA Supreme Court
Employers Can Use Anti-SLAAP Statute to Force Early Screening of Some Employee Claims
California’s anti-SLAPP statute — found in Code of Civil Procedure §425.16 — allows a defendant to request early judicial screening of a legal claim that targets that defendant’s protected free speech or petitioning activities. Until yesterday, it has been an open question in California as to whether or not California’s anti-SLAPP statute could be used… Read More
CA Supreme Court Rejects the “De Minimis” Doctrine — Employers Must Now Pay for Every Minute Worked by an Employee
California has some of the strictest and most complicated wage and hour laws in the nation. And guess what? They’re even stricter and more complicated now after the California Supreme Court rejected the “de minimis” defense for employers in wage and hour disputes in California. What’s the “de minimis” defense anyway? Beginning in 1961, federal… Read More
CA Supreme Court — Bonuses Impact “Rate of Pay” and Thus Overtime Calculations
California already has one of the most generous and employee-friendly overtime laws in the country. Employees in California earn overtime anytime they work over 8 hours in a day OR 40 hours in a week. Overtime is paid at 1.5 times the employee’s regular “rate of pay.” Calculating an Employee’s Regular Rate of Pay But,… Read More
CA Supreme Court — Employees Have Broad Discovery Rights in PAGA Actions
Yesterday, in a unanimous 7-0 opinion, the California Supreme Court held in Williams v. Marshalls of CA that plaintiffs suing employers in Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) are entitled to broad discovery rights. Specifically, the Court held that PAGA plaintiffs can force an employer-defendant to turn over the names and contact information of other current and former… Read More
CA Supreme Court Clarifies Employers’ “Day of Rest” Obligations
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court answered some admittedly “unsettled questions” under California law regarding an employer’s obligation to provide a day of rest to employees under California’s day of rest statutes (codified at Labor Code §550-558.1. These statutes prohibit an employer from “caus[ing] his employees to work more than six days in seven” (§552), but do not… Read More
CA Supreme Court: Employees Must Be Relieved of All Duties During Rest Breaks
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court ruled in Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc. that employers must relieve employees of all work duties during their 10-minute rest breaks. This landmark decision now means that employers must treat rest breaks and meal breaks the same — and that employers must relinquish all control over employees during both… Read More
CA Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of “Prevailing Party”
California law states that the “prevailing party” in a lawsuit is entitled to recover its costs from the other party. The law defines the “prevailing party” as “the party with a net monetary recovery” and “a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered.” So what happens when a plaintiff sues a defendant but, before… Read More
CA Supreme Court Rules Employee Can Sue Employer and Collect Damages Even Though Employee Used Fraudulent Social Security Number to Get Hired
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court ruled in Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co. that an employee who uses a false Social Security number to fraudulently obtain his job may still sue his employer for discrimination and recover damages. At issue was whether a California state statute granting employment law rights to all California residents “regardless of immigration… Read More
CA Supreme Court Reverses Prior Decision in Sonic Calabasas v. Moreno
On October 17, 2013, the CA Supreme Court overturned its February 2011 decision in Sonic Calabasas v. Moreno (“Sonic I”). Unfortunately, however, the dense, scholarly, 73-page opinion — known as Sonic Calabasas v. Moreno II (“Sonic II”) — gives little clarity to California employers trying to craft defensible, enforceable arbitration agreements. Background In the original Sonic… Read More
