Archive for arbitration

An Employee’s Single PAGA Claim Cannot Be Split into Arbitration and Litigation Pieces

Back in 2014, the California Supreme Court ruled in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles that an individual employee who has signed a mandatory arbitration agreement may be compelled to arbitrate his “individual damages claims.”  However, if that employee joins a representative PAGA claim to his other damages claims, that…

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waivers

It was only a few weeks ago.  California employees and their lawyers were jubilant after the CA Supreme Court delivered its game-changing Dynamex decision that made it even harder for California employers to properly classify workers as independent contractors.  As a result, employment protections were extended to millions of California…

Arbitration Agreements — A Seawall to Surging PAGA Lawsuits?

Since its passage in 2004, California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) has been a weapon used by employees and their lawyers across California.  PAGA allows one “aggrieved employee” to sue his/her employer in a representative capacity and to recover penalties and attorneys’ fees for technical violations of the California…

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Determine Legality of Class Action Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide whether class action waivers in employee arbitration agreements violate federal law.  This is a huge development, with potentially far-reaching implications for many California employers.  But, first, a little background (okay, actually it’s a lot of background, but it’s important) —…

California Employers Cannot Force Employees to Litigate or Arbitrate in Another State

California employment laws are some of the most pro-employee laws in the nation.  That’s why so many large California employers, and their clever legal counsel, often try to get California employees to sign employment agreements that prohibit the employee from suing in this state (forcing them, instead, to…

Governor Brown Signs SB 1007 Allowing Parties in Arbitration to Request Reporters for Hearings and Depositions

Last week, Governor Brown Signed SB 1007, which gives the parties to an arbitration “the right to have a certified shorthand reporter transcribe any deposition, proceeding, or hearing as the official record.”  This new law requires the party who wants to the reporter make his/her/its request in a…

California Legislature Approves AB 465 — Future of Employment Arbitration Agreements in Doubt in California

Recently, the California Legislature passed AB 465 which prevents employers from requiring employees to sign mandatory pre-employment arbitration agreements as a condition of employment.  This bill, which is now sitting on Governor Brown’s desk awaiting his signature, adds a new provision of the California Labor Code making it…

Governor Brown Signs AB 2617, Further Restricting Arbitration in California

On September 30, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 2617.  This new law prohibits mandatory, pre-dispute arbitration agreements in contracts for goods and services, to the extent the agreement purports to waive rights provided by California Civil Code 51.7 (the “Ralph Civil Rights Act”) and/or 52.1 (the…

Governor Brown Signs AB 802 Requiring Arbitration Companies to Disclose Private Arbitration Stats

On  September 30, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 802.  Under this new law, which takes effect on January 1, 2015, private arbitration companies (e.g., AAA, JAMS) will be required to collect and publish certain information about private arbitrations they administer.  The previously private information which must…